Navigation

Home › Forums › Crumble › Scratch › ScratchCrumble testing release

Tagged: 

This topic contains 61 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  Simon 2 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 62 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 6, 2015 at 6:40 am #2495

    Simon
    Moderator

    ScratchCrumble syntax
    Simon

    July 6, 2015 at 7:07 am #2496

    Simon
    Moderator

    @drkempton
    Ran fine all last night (in my PyCharm development setup)
    So I’ve release V.0.1.2 and running the ScratchCrumbleDev.exe in a cmd window to see what happens

    July 8, 2015 at 3:22 pm #2502

    Simon
    Moderator

    Version 0.1.3 – should have fixed the crash when loading/saving projects

    Simon

    July 8, 2015 at 4:29 pm #2503

    Simon
    Moderator

    That didn’t last long 🙁
    Try 0.1.4
    Version = ‘v0.1.4’ #Error raised from CrumCon and loop delay set to 0.5 sec

    July 9, 2015 at 7:06 am #2505

    Simon
    Moderator

    Version = ‘v0.1.5‘ #9Jul15 Bug in reading Input C fixed

    🙁 Still crashes out on me when I run the exe but fine in Pycharm dev setup – going to try a different .py -> exe prog

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by  Simon.
    July 12, 2015 at 3:20 pm #2507

    Simon
    Moderator

    Version v0.1.6 #12Jul – different installer used

    I’ve switched to using CXFreeze which produces an MSI
    Please let me know how you get on with this one and hopefully the crashing bug will have gone!

    July 12, 2015 at 5:57 pm #2509

    drkempton
    Participant

    Hi Simon,

    It is certainly a lot better. But it still crashes eventually. This time after tens of minutes rather than just a minute or two. Also the input sensing is not robust. Input A tied high still gets sensed as low intermittently. I also had trouble getting the other B,C,D inputs to work at all.

    It will be interesting to see what other testers find.

    David.

    July 12, 2015 at 6:56 pm #2510

    Simon
    Moderator

    Can you run this script with Pin D tied to A – no extermal power apart from USB

    Test

    July 12, 2015 at 8:25 pm #2511

    Simon
    Moderator

    Mines made up to a count of 5 since 7pm – 5 in 2hrs 20 mins
    Just tested B and C inputs and they’ve responded fine (within the current limits of only sampling twice per second)

    Simon

    July 13, 2015 at 7:33 am #2514

    Simon
    Moderator

    Ran fine all night (12hours) but there is a noticable lag on detecting B & C changes so going to look into that

    Simon

    July 13, 2015 at 12:40 pm #2515

    Simon
    Moderator

    mm – just tried it on one of my schools on the w2k8 server (as thats the machine I sit at) and it did perculier things

    Starts off ok with D connected to A -leave it a few minutes – fine
    But very shortly after connecting B to D as well, it starts thinking A is LO and then just stops responding

    I think I’ve have to do some native Python tests (without Scratch) just to make sure the basics are working

    Simon

    July 13, 2015 at 1:16 pm #2516

    Simon
    Moderator

    Nah – just leaving it alone and it goes off-piste!
    Lets try using this as test routine – out of 4 runs – maximum time it lasted was 80 secs

    July 14, 2015 at 7:58 am #2517

    Simon
    Moderator

    OK ran same Scratch routine but running ScratchCrumble.py direct from my Pycharm IDE and it lasted till 1500 secs before exceeding the 100 count.

    I’m thinking that could just be an accumulation of 100 blips rather than a fail at 1500 sec – I’ll need to write a better Scratch logger to see if that’s true

    July 14, 2015 at 5:25 pm #2518

    Simon
    Moderator

    OK this is now test script to record events
    http://snag.gy/7dsRf.jpg

    and export of record list which shows about 4/5 events

    2039.567
    2039.592
    2039.616
    2039.648
    2039.669
    2039.694
    2039.722
    2039.754
    2039.773
    2039.798
    2039.825
    2039.867
    2039.88
    2039.905
    2039.93
    2039.962
    2039.981
    2040.006
    2040.032
    2112.123
    2322.772
    2322.816
    2322.823
    2322.85
    2322.876
    2322.917
    2322.925
    2322.953
    2322.975
    2323.009
    2323.025
    2323.05
    2323.075
    2323.107
    2323.126
    2323.153
    2323.176
    2323.215
    2323.227
    2323.252
    2537.984
    2538.01
    2538.043
    2538.06
    2538.087
    2538.112
    2538.15
    2538.162
    2538.188
    2538.214
    2538.248
    2538.264
    2538.289
    2538.314
    2538.349
    2538.364
    2538.389
    2538.414
    2538.445
    2927.353
    2927.36
    2927.384
    2927.41
    2927.451
    2927.462
    2927.487
    2927.515
    2927.547
    2927.562
    2927.586
    2927.611
    2927.641
    2927.662
    2927.688
    2927.716
    2927.745
    2927.766
    2927.791
    2927.816
    2941.36
    2941.373
    2941.398
    2941.424
    2941.468
    2941.475
    2941.499
    2941.529
    2941.56
    2941.575
    2941.6
    2941.624
    2941.654
    2941.674
    2941.699
    2941.726
    2941.754
    2941.774
    2941.799
    2941.825
    3424.308
    3424.333

    July 14, 2015 at 9:48 pm #2520

    Simon
    Moderator

    Ok – I had a thought that it might be clashing between threads so I’ve added some locks to the I/O routines and it lasted up to 4700 on my setup here without any errors (but of course I may have just been lucky)

    Anyway – its back to the old packaging system for V0.2.1

    Try it and see what happens please

    Simon

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 62 total)
1 2 3 4 5

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.